Part 2

Part 2: The Medical System’s Blind Spot—Gender, Race, and Bias

“I knew something was wrong. But they wouldn’t listen.”

In many healthcare settings, pain and distress are filtered through an invisible algorithm—a formula shaped by race, gender, mental health history, and social status. For countless people, particularly those who are not white, male, and cisgender, this algorithm quietly downgrades their suffering.

When someone from a marginalized background enters the medical system with a psychiatric history, the risk of being ignored multiplies. In these instances, the clinical term diagnostic overshadowing collides with broader systemic biases—and the result is devastating.

Bias in Medicine Isn’t Just Personal. It’s Structural.

Implicit bias is now widely acknowledged as a factor in healthcare disparities. But when mental illness is part of the picture, those biases often intensify—and operate in ways that are harder to detect and challenge.

Take the example of a Black woman reporting chest pain in the ER. She may be labeled as “dramatic” or “drug-seeking,” especially if her chart includes a mental health diagnosis. Her symptoms might be written off as anxiety, and she may be discharged without the workup that a white male patient with the same complaint would receive.

“It’s not just that they didn’t believe me,” says one patient. “It’s that they assumed I was exaggerating to get attention.”

The Data: Bias By the Numbers

The evidence is as damning as it is clear:

  • Black patients are significantly less likely to receive pain medication for the same injuries compared to white patients. A 2016 study in PNAS found that some medical professionals falsely believed that Black patients have “thicker skin” or “less sensitive nerve endings.”

  • Women are more likely to be misdiagnosed with a mental illness when experiencing physical symptoms of serious illnesses like heart attacks or autoimmune disorders.

  • Transgender and nonbinary people face disproportionate rates of discrimination in healthcare and are often not taken seriously—even when presenting with severe symptoms.

These disparities exist independently, but they are amplified when a mental health diagnosis is present. The patient is no longer just “difficult” or “confusing”—they become “unreliable.”

Mental Health Labels Stick—and Stigmatize

When someone carries a diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or schizophrenia, it can become a catch-all explanation. This is especially true for people of color, who already face disproportionate rates of misdiagnosis.

For example:

  • Black men are more likely to be diagnosed with schizophrenia and less likely to receive a diagnosis of depression compared to white men, even when presenting with similar symptoms.

  • Latina women often have their physical complaints dismissed as "somatization," or emotional distress manifesting physically.

And when these communities advocate for themselves—asking for further testing or second opinions—they’re often labeled “non-compliant” or “hostile.”

Why Doctors Don’t Always Hear What Patients Are Saying

It’s important to understand that doctors aren’t immune to the social forces around them. Many work under enormous pressure, short appointment times, and systemic demands. But even well-meaning physicians bring unconscious biases into the exam room—especially when dealing with patients whose experiences don’t fit the mold of textbook medicine.

This can lead to:

  • Premature closure: making a diagnosis early and ignoring new evidence

  • Attribution bias: assuming new symptoms are related to a mental illness

  • Communication breakdowns: not taking the time to fully hear the patient’s story

Listening as a Tool of Equity

Listening—truly listening—can help correct the course. Studies show that patient-centered communication leads to better diagnostic accuracy, greater patient satisfaction, and improved outcomes.

So what would this look like?

  • Validating symptoms without jumping to conclusions

  • Asking open-ended questions that allow patients to explain what they’re feeling in their own words

  • Examining bias as part of continuing medical education—not just as a one-off training

What Patients Can Do When They’re Dismissed

While the burden should not fall on patients, the reality is that self-advocacy is often necessary. Here are some strategies:

  1. Name the pattern: “I’m concerned my symptoms are being attributed to anxiety without ruling out other causes.”

  2. Request documentation: Ask the provider to note in your record what tests they are not doing and why.

  3. Bring an ally: A friend or family member can serve as a witness and an advocate.

  4. File a report: If you feel mistreated, consider filing a formal complaint with the clinic or hospital’s patient relations department.

A Path Toward Change

To make healthcare more equitable, we need both systemic reform and cultural transformation. That means:

  • Incorporating anti-racism and gender bias education in medical training

  • Building trauma-informed care models that integrate physical and mental health

  • Holding healthcare institutions accountable for disparities in outcomes

Most of all, we must treat listening not as a luxury—but as a core clinical skill.

“Believing patients is the first step toward healing them.”

📚 References

  • Hoffman, K. M., Trawalter, S., Axt, J. R., & Oliver, M. N. (2016). Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. PNAS, 113(16), 4296–4301.

  • Hamberg, K. (2008). Gender bias in medicine. Women’s Health, 4(3), 237–243.

  • Metzl, J. M., & Roberts, D. E. (2014). Structural competency meets structural racism: Race, politics, and the structure of medical knowledge. AMA Journal of Ethics.

Previous
Previous

Part 3

Next
Next

Part 1